![]() Also, it fails to find some repeated words. But on a slightly deeper analysis, we find that it also finds words which, in fact, are not repeated. And we may be tempted to go with this query. When we run this query, we see that it does help us in finding the valid repeated words. We may start writing the GREP code like this: Let us see if we can do this using GREP Find Change: Even when the repeated words are found, it is a long and tedious process to find each instance of repeated word in the document and change it. If words are not in the dictionary, those words do not get underlined and Check Spelling does not help us in removing them. It shows an underline for the repeated words in the chosen color.īut the limitation of Dynamic Spelling is that it highlights only those words that are in the Dictionary of the Language that is chosen. And Dynamic Spelling does help to a certain extent in highlighting the repeated words. ![]() One possible alternative is to use the Dynamic Spelling feature. The words or parts of words that should not be considered repeated are underlined with Green. The valid repeated words have been underlined with Red. Is there a way to get rid of these repeated words in InDesign correctly? Let us look at an example and a couple of alternatives to find the repeated words. How often do we come across repeated (duplicate) words in a document? We may inadvertently type these repeated words ourselves in InDesign or bring in a document containing these repeated words.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
June 2023
Categories |